<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: y.ah.oo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo</link>
	<description>Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3625</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3625</guid>
		<description>I would like to extract the whole "copying" thing and and replace it with following. That might be easier to handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to extract the whole &#8220;copying&#8221; thing and and replace it with following. That might be easier to handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-107246</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-107246</guid>
		<description>I would like to extract the whole "copying" thing and and replace it with following. That might be easier to handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to extract the whole &#8220;copying&#8221; thing and and replace it with following. That might be easier to handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97526</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97526</guid>
		<description>I would like to extract the whole "copying" thing and and replace it with following. That might be easier to handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to extract the whole &#8220;copying&#8221; thing and and replace it with following. That might be easier to handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>I know what you're saying, I'm just pointing out that a lot of this stuff is just the cycle of evolving technology, not one company "copying" another to become successful. My point was that these things were being done by Yahoo before Google did them, so to say that Yahoo is copying Google is kind of silly.

And about the use of AJAX in the implementation, just because Google did it before Yahoo doesn't mean that Yahoo is copying Google, since neither of them invented that idea. That's like saying that Google is a total rip off of Yahoo because they use HTML, javascript, css, etc. on their pages, since Yahoo "implemented" their site using those techniques long before Google.

PS - This may just be my own personal preference, but I think Yahoo maps are better than Google's, in terms of driving directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you&#8217;re saying, I&#8217;m just pointing out that a lot of this stuff is just the cycle of evolving technology, not one company &#8220;copying&#8221; another to become successful. My point was that these things were being done by Yahoo before Google did them, so to say that Yahoo is copying Google is kind of silly.</p>
<p>And about the use of AJAX in the implementation, just because Google did it before Yahoo doesn&#8217;t mean that Yahoo is copying Google, since neither of them invented that idea. That&#8217;s like saying that Google is a total rip off of Yahoo because they use HTML, javascript, css, etc. on their pages, since Yahoo &#8220;implemented&#8221; their site using those techniques long before Google.</p>
<p>PS - This may just be my own personal preference, but I think Yahoo maps are better than Google&#8217;s, in terms of driving directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97525</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97525</guid>
		<description>I know what you're saying, I'm just pointing out that a lot of this stuff is just the cycle of evolving technology, not one company "copying" another to become successful. My point was that these things were being done by Yahoo before Google did them, so to say that Yahoo is copying Google is kind of silly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And about the use of AJAX in the implementation, just because Google did it before Yahoo doesn't mean that Yahoo is copying Google, since neither of them invented that idea. That's like saying that Google is a total rip off of Yahoo because they use HTML, javascript, css, etc. on their pages, since Yahoo "implemented" their site using those techniques long before Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - This may just be my own personal preference, but I think Yahoo maps are better than Google's, in terms of driving directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you&#8217;re saying, I&#8217;m just pointing out that a lot of this stuff is just the cycle of evolving technology, not one company &#8220;copying&#8221; another to become successful. My point was that these things were being done by Yahoo before Google did them, so to say that Yahoo is copying Google is kind of silly.</p>
<p>And about the use of AJAX in the implementation, just because Google did it before Yahoo doesn&#8217;t mean that Yahoo is copying Google, since neither of them invented that idea. That&#8217;s like saying that Google is a total rip off of Yahoo because they use HTML, javascript, css, etc. on their pages, since Yahoo &#8220;implemented&#8221; their site using those techniques long before Google.</p>
<p>PS - This may just be my own personal preference, but I think Yahoo maps are better than Google&#8217;s, in terms of driving directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3623</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3623</guid>
		<description>Okay but Google made everything that Yahoo! did better. And now they are copying there success by implementing their apps in the same fashion.

Everyone did maps but no one did in a useful way like  Google does. And now everyone is doing it in the same exact fashion.

I'm not talking about the service I'm talking about implementation.

Everyone did search, maps, email and others before Google but since Google has created such a following because of how those services are implemented people are copying how they implement maps, email, and search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay but Google made everything that Yahoo! did better. And now they are copying there success by implementing their apps in the same fashion.</p>
<p>Everyone did maps but no one did in a useful way like  Google does. And now everyone is doing it in the same exact fashion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not talking about the service I&#8217;m talking about implementation.</p>
<p>Everyone did search, maps, email and others before Google but since Google has created such a following because of how those services are implemented people are copying how they implement maps, email, and search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>Yahoo had maps long before Google too, so you could say that Google was "copying" Yahoo in almost everything they do (web mail, search, maps, etc.) if you want to look at it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo had maps long before Google too, so you could say that Google was &#8220;copying&#8221; Yahoo in almost everything they do (web mail, search, maps, etc.) if you want to look at it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97524</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97524</guid>
		<description>Okay but Google made everything that Yahoo! did better. And now they are copying there success by implementing their apps in the same fashion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone did maps but no one did in a useful way like  Google does. And now everyone is doing it in the same exact fashion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not talking about the service I'm talking about implementation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone did search, maps, email and others before Google but since Google has created such a following because of how those services are implemented people are copying how they implement maps, email, and search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay but Google made everything that Yahoo! did better. And now they are copying there success by implementing their apps in the same fashion.</p>
<p>Everyone did maps but no one did in a useful way like  Google does. And now everyone is doing it in the same exact fashion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not talking about the service I&#8217;m talking about implementation.</p>
<p>Everyone did search, maps, email and others before Google but since Google has created such a following because of how those services are implemented people are copying how they implement maps, email, and search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97523</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97523</guid>
		<description>Yahoo had maps long before Google too, so you could say that Google was "copying" Yahoo in almost everything they do (web mail, search, maps, etc.) if you want to look at it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo had maps long before Google too, so you could say that Google was &#8220;copying&#8221; Yahoo in almost everything they do (web mail, search, maps, etc.) if you want to look at it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>1. Yeah blame it on timing.

2. &lt;strong&gt;GOOD&lt;/strong&gt; searching with real algorithms.

3. yeah, isn't that copying. There is a first then there are people that see how good it is and start duplicating it. Forget about email then, what about maps and ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Yeah blame it on timing.</p>
<p>2. <strong>GOOD</strong> searching with real algorithms.</p>
<p>3. yeah, isn&#8217;t that copying. There is a first then there are people that see how good it is and start duplicating it. Forget about email then, what about maps and ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>I'll have to disagree with you on all 3 (mp3 players, search engines, and ajax). The MP3 player thing is probably closest to being true, but even then, there were plenty of players out before the iPod - it just took a while for it to catch on to the public and Apple capitalized on that timing.

You are showing your age with the Google comment; Google didn't start until '98, WAY after people had been using search engines for a long time.

Just because Google was the first to use AJAX in e-mail doesn't mean Yahoo is copying them when they do it, because it's a web development technique that Google definitely did not invent. That's like saying that any site that uses Javascript, CSS, etc, etc, is just copying the first site that did so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to disagree with you on all 3 (mp3 players, search engines, and ajax). The MP3 player thing is probably closest to being true, but even then, there were plenty of players out before the iPod - it just took a while for it to catch on to the public and Apple capitalized on that timing.</p>
<p>You are showing your age with the Google comment; Google didn&#8217;t start until &#8216;98, WAY after people had been using search engines for a long time.</p>
<p>Just because Google was the first to use AJAX in e-mail doesn&#8217;t mean Yahoo is copying them when they do it, because it&#8217;s a web development technique that Google definitely did not invent. That&#8217;s like saying that any site that uses Javascript, CSS, etc, etc, is just copying the first site that did so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97522</guid>
		<description>1. Yeah blame it on timing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. &lt;strong&gt;GOOD&lt;/strong&gt; searching with real algorithms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. yeah, isn't that copying. There is a first then there are people that see how good it is and start duplicating it. Forget about email then, what about maps and ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Yeah blame it on timing.</p>
<p>2. <strong>GOOD</strong> searching with real algorithms.</p>
<p>3. yeah, isn&#8217;t that copying. There is a first then there are people that see how good it is and start duplicating it. Forget about email then, what about maps and ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97521</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97521</guid>
		<description>I'll have to disagree with you on all 3 (mp3 players, search engines, and ajax). The MP3 player thing is probably closest to being true, but even then, there were plenty of players out before the iPod - it just took a while for it to catch on to the public and Apple capitalized on that timing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are showing your age with the Google comment; Google didn't start until '98, WAY after people had been using search engines for a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just because Google was the first to use AJAX in e-mail doesn't mean Yahoo is copying them when they do it, because it's a web development technique that Google definitely did not invent. That's like saying that any site that uses Javascript, CSS, etc, etc, is just copying the first site that did so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to disagree with you on all 3 (mp3 players, search engines, and ajax). The MP3 player thing is probably closest to being true, but even then, there were plenty of players out before the iPod - it just took a while for it to catch on to the public and Apple capitalized on that timing.</p>
<p>You are showing your age with the Google comment; Google didn&#8217;t start until &#8216;98, WAY after people had been using search engines for a long time.</p>
<p>Just because Google was the first to use AJAX in e-mail doesn&#8217;t mean Yahoo is copying them when they do it, because it&#8217;s a web development technique that Google definitely did not invent. That&#8217;s like saying that any site that uses Javascript, CSS, etc, etc, is just copying the first site that did so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>Ajax was a tool and Yahoo! is copying Google with using that tool for email, as is M$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajax was a tool and Yahoo! is copying Google with using that tool for email, as is M$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>Thanks.

So had mp3 players but barely anyone was making them until the iPod.

So was search engines until google made a good one.

And they definitely are copying the contextual ads service as is M$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>So had mp3 players but barely anyone was making them until the iPod.</p>
<p>So was search engines until google made a good one.</p>
<p>And they definitely are copying the contextual ads service as is M$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>Just got an error when I posted that comment:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Warning: mkdir(): SAFE MODE Restriction in effect. The script whose uid is 579 is not allowed to access /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/teb-super-archive-cache owned by uid 48 in /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/plugins/teb-super-archive/teb-super-archive.php on line 193&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got an error when I posted that comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Warning: mkdir(): SAFE MODE Restriction in effect. The script whose uid is 579 is not allowed to access /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/teb-super-archive-cache owned by uid 48 in /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/plugins/teb-super-archive/teb-super-archive.php on line 193</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>Using AJAX doesn't necessarily mean that they're copying GMail, since Ajax has been around longer than GMail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using AJAX doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that they&#8217;re copying GMail, since Ajax has been around longer than GMail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97520</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97520</guid>
		<description>Ajax was a tool and Yahoo! is copying Google with using that tool for email, as is M$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajax was a tool and Yahoo! is copying Google with using that tool for email, as is M$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97519</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97519</guid>
		<description>Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So had mp3 players but barely anyone was making them until the iPod.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So was search engines until google made a good one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And they definitely are copying the contextual ads service as is M$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>So had mp3 players but barely anyone was making them until the iPod.</p>
<p>So was search engines until google made a good one.</p>
<p>And they definitely are copying the contextual ads service as is M$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/yahoo#comment-97518</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/new/?p=742#comment-97518</guid>
		<description>Just got an error when I posted that comment:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Warning: mkdir(): SAFE MODE Restriction in effect. The script whose uid is 579 is not allowed to access /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/teb-super-archive-cache owned by uid 48 in /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/plugins/teb-super-archive/teb-super-archive.php on line 193&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got an error when I posted that comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Warning: mkdir(): SAFE MODE Restriction in effect. The script whose uid is 579 is not allowed to access /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/teb-super-archive-cache owned by uid 48 in /home/211/domains/scatteredmedia.com/html/dancameron.org/wp-content/plugins/teb-super-archive/teb-super-archive.php on line 193</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
