logoAbout Me: I'm a freelance web developer that specializes in WordPress Themes and plugin development. I've written about some of my projects here.
Hire me e-mail

Home / blog / Wordpress rally

I’d recommend reading this illogical post from Duncan at Techcrunch and then rally around Matt in the comments section.

After reading all of Duncan’s and Matt’s comments I had to throw my two-cents in,

Duncan: I don’t see your point. You mention that Matt can’t have it both ways but by writing this article and placing *your* issues into a “gray area” you’re rewarding your terms with two-ways to lean; neither for or against, making you’re actually opinion irrelevant. And isn’t this just an opinion piece? I don’t see any facts–that are correct–, it’s all lambasting for self-promotion, similar to your friends at Vallywag.

No matter how many times you’ll be told that your statements are false and irrational you’ll always be clinging to that “gray area” message.

In your response to the question you pose to Matt, “WTF did someone do to you BTW? Where did this hatred come from?”. What exactly made you criticize Matt–and by association the entire wordpress community of developers and supporters–? All without one ounce of research of how to properly run a business through OSS, the business model of automattic and how Matt runs it, the history of wordpress or even get to know how spam works? Instead of reporting you glued your self-important thoughts together and lambasted the very person AND the community that built the infrastructure for you to get paid from.

I find this post so disturbing as D’s trying to associate taking advantage users by placing paid text ads on released code is the same as Matt providing a service through Wordpress.com and Akismet. He really needs to step back and learn a few things, specifically:

The Blogroll: it’s there as an example for users, is easily managable and provides a credit to the hard working developer community. Since Matt works very hard at wordpress.org he deserves it like the others. Lastly how does he make money off of those links again?

Akismet: Is entirely a service. Yes the free Akismet users contribute to the whole but they also benefit is the entire community. Matt is not holding back the perfect solution to stop all spam for every wordpress user, he’s just providing an added value to the paid users of Akismet because it includes a service level that the free addition could not support.

Wordpress.com: Charging for an extra service level through Wordpress.com doesn’t leverage the community nor the code-base. It’s a service level agreement that you’re paying for, similar to Akismet.

Update: Another comment.

  • pfft.

    rally around matt? no thanks. the default blogroll is not a "good example". a Good Example would be a link to wordpress.org, a link to the forums, and a link to the codex.

    there's a reason the blogroll hasn't been updated since 1.2 (i can't be sure). it is spammy, matt knows it, so he's leaving it there as a mistake he's not sure how to correct. if he updates it, it means he still thinks it's valid. so no, it isn't providing credit to the developer community. it's providing credit to very few people, most of whom have left the development community.

    his point about pligg is valid, although in his post it's hard to get from his post that he's not equating pligg with vanilla.
  • I just read the article and some of the comments (all of the ones from Duncan and Matt, plus a few others), and commented on it myself.

    Matt did a very fine job of defending himself in the comments, and I hesitated to even bother commenting myself, because it seems obvious that the author is just not getting it, and (furthermore) not willing to get it.

    The bottom line is that Duncan's whole point is based on a misrepresentation of Matt's position ("making money is bad" - which Matt never said), and since he got that completely wrong his whole argument falls apart; he just can't see that for some reason.
  • Over the past two days, I've debated responding to that article, and have decided that it would cause more trouble than it was worth.
    Besides, I think Matt acquitted himself very well, and doesn't need me jumping into his playground, fists flying.
    I do find it fascinating how the comments divided themselves so clearly into Matt-haters and non-Matt-haters. Not even WP-haters and non WP-haters. Not only did the article start that way, but the author actively encouraged the conversation to break down to that in his comments.
    Anyway, thank you for so much for putting your opinions into the mix in a far less negative place for me to go :)
blog comments powered by Disqus