<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parsing the Querystring for dynamic content (and images)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dancameron.org/general/parsing-the-querystring-for-dynamic-content-and-images/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancameron.org/general/parsing-the-querystring-for-dynamic-content-and-images</link>
	<description>Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cameron</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/parsing-the-querystring-for-dynamic-content-and-images#comment-24305</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/?p=2171#comment-24305</guid>
		<description>Out of 136K visitors in the last week we had a total of 4 with js disabled.

And I'm not worried about standards on this site, it's a train-wreck already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of 136K visitors in the last week we had a total of 4 with js disabled.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not worried about standards on this site, it&#8217;s a train-wreck already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaredB</title>
		<link>http://dancameron.org/general/parsing-the-querystring-for-dynamic-content-and-images#comment-24303</link>
		<dc:creator>JaredB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancameron.org/?p=2171#comment-24303</guid>
		<description>I'm assuming that you're not worried about people who have Javascript disabled, right?

Also, I can't remember the details right now, but I know I've seen a lot of standards people poo-pooing document.write and favoring standard DOM methods instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming that you&#8217;re not worried about people who have Javascript disabled, right?</p>
<p>Also, I can&#8217;t remember the details right now, but I know I&#8217;ve seen a lot of standards people poo-pooing document.write and favoring standard DOM methods instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
