MS= 7,944, OS X = 0

PCs Windows Infected in 12 Minutes

About the Author, Dan Cameron:

I'm the owner and solution engineer , a web solutions company that specializes in web development including WordPress.

I started my first blog in 2003 and transitioned to WordPress in 2004. Since moving to WordPress I've written a few plugins and themes for public consumption. Lately I'm busy engineering/building/coding and have only been able to share a few code snippets.

If you're in need of some web development, web design or custom WordPress plugins and/or themes contact me, I'll be happy to discuss it with you.

Read More »

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    I guess I’m going to have to start writing some Mac viruses to dispel the misconception that statistics like this can create. The Mac OS (out of the box) suffers from most of the same security design flaws that Windows does, it just isn’t as big a target, so people don’t waste their time writing for it if their goal is to hit as many computers as they can.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    I guess I’m going to have to start writing some Mac viruses to dispel the misconception that statistics like this can create. The Mac OS (out of the box) suffers from most of the same security design flaws that Windows does, it just isn’t as big a target, so people don’t waste their time writing for it if their goal is to hit as many computers as they can.

  • nstryker

    does that really prove that it’s “less secure”? does security only have to exist programatically? not that i’m a huge fan of security through obscurity.

  • nstryker

    does that really prove that it’s “less secure”? does security only have to exist programatically? not that i’m a huge fan of security through obscurity.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    properly configured Windows or Mac computer will not be vulnerable to infection when it is connected to the network, whereas the “average” setup of either operating system is vulnerable to attacks on a number of levels. The Mac default is certainly better than the Windows one, but it’s not perfect, and given more interest by the people writing these kinds of applications would probably be just as infected.

    Anyway, Dan here’s a link to a good security guide for OSX, from the NSA. They have similar ones for the Windows operating systems as well; they’re pretty interesting reading if you’re into that sort of thing.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    properly configured Windows or Mac computer will not be vulnerable to infection when it is connected to the network, whereas the “average” setup of either operating system is vulnerable to attacks on a number of levels. The Mac default is certainly better than the Windows one, but it’s not perfect, and given more interest by the people writing these kinds of applications would probably be just as infected.

    Anyway, Dan here’s a link to a good security guide for OSX, from the NSA. They have similar ones for the Windows operating systems as well; they’re pretty interesting reading if you’re into that sort of thing.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    I guess I’m going to have to start writing some Mac viruses to dispel the misconception that statistics like this can create. The Mac OS (out of the box) suffers from most of the same security design flaws that Windows does, it just isn’t as big a target, so people don’t waste their time writing for it if their goal is to hit as many computers as they can.

  • nstryker

    does that really prove that it’s “less secure”? does security only have to exist programatically? not that i’m a huge fan of security through obscurity.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    No, you are correct – the main security flaws in both operating systems are issues of design (for the sake of convenience) rather than programming errors.

    A properly configured Windows or Mac computer will not be vulnerable to infection when it is connected to the network, whereas the “average” setup of either operating system is vulnerable to attacks on a number of levels. The Mac default is certainly better than the Windows one, but it’s not perfect, and given more interest by the people writing these kinds of applications would probably be just as infected.

    Anyway, Dan here’s a link to a good security guide for OSX, from the NSA. They have similar ones for the Windows operating systems as well; they’re pretty interesting reading if you’re into that sort of thing.

  • Nate

    What! unix has design flaws? Bah.

  • Nate

    What! unix has design flaws? Bah.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    No, Apple’s implementation does.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    No, Apple’s implementation does.

  • Nate

    What! unix has design flaws? Bah.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    No, Apple’s implementation does.

  • Dave Z

    Maybe you and Steve Jobs are the only mac users left.

  • Dave Z

    Maybe you and Steve Jobs are the only mac users left.

  • nstryker

    and nathan sometimes…now

  • nstryker

    and nathan sometimes…now

  • Dave Z

    Maybe you and Steve Jobs are the only mac users left.

  • nstryker

    and nathan sometimes…now

  • Dave Z

    sorry Mr. S., only hippies and Dan can use the mac.

  • Dave Z

    sorry Mr. S., only hippies and Dan can use the mac.

  • Dave Z

    Mr. S. don’t go to the dark side, Macs are so dial-up.

  • Dave Z

    Mr. S. don’t go to the dark side, Macs are so dial-up.

  • nstryker

    i’ve always been bi-compual.

  • nstryker

    i’ve always been bi-compual.

  • Dave Z

    sorry Mr. S., only hippies and Dan can use the mac.

  • Dave Z

    Mr. S. don’t go to the dark side, Macs are so dial-up.

  • nstryker

    i’ve always been bi-compual.

blog comments powered by Disqus