AOhell

I look at AOL as a great resource for those older grandpas and grandmas who have no clue. They can log in and there email is there with a great portal of web links and pretty pictures for them to click on. But are they making it too easy?
Today I needed to help a middle aged woman just get to AOL. She had no idea how a URL worked and that you could just type in AOL.com in the web browser, press enter and it would take you to the AOL. Wow.
Is AOL enabling these people to become total computer noobs or is it user error?

About the Author, Dan Cameron:

I'm the owner and solution engineer , a web solutions company that specializes in web development including WordPress.

I started my first blog in 2003 and transitioned to WordPress in 2004. Since moving to WordPress I've written a few plugins and themes for public consumption. Lately I'm busy engineering/building/coding and have only been able to share a few code snippets.

If you're in need of some web development, web design or custom WordPress plugins and/or themes contact me, I'll be happy to discuss it with you.

Read More »

  • nstryker

    wrong with them being ignorant?

  • nstryker

    wrong with them being ignorant?

  • nstryker

    wrong with them being ignorant?

  • nstryker

    wrong with them being ignorant?

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    AOL might make it easier for some people, but in some ways it fails at this too.

    Having everything together (web, e-mail, etc. in one app) with simple, obvious icons, etc. is a good idea for that kind of user, but AOL (these days at least – or last time I saw it) clutters it up with too many ads and other junk (especially proprietary AOL content) that it’s still too confusing for a lot of people.

    IMHO, the ideal would be two simple interfaces in the app (with big buttons on the side or something to switch between them) – simple web browser email.

    I’d like to say that the time for this has come and gone, and everyone should just be able to understand the concept of “the internet”, and separate “connection” from applications, etc. but I know that’s not the case, and that’s fine.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    AOL might make it easier for some people, but in some ways it fails at this too.

    Having everything together (web, e-mail, etc. in one app) with simple, obvious icons, etc. is a good idea for that kind of user, but AOL (these days at least – or last time I saw it) clutters it up with too many ads and other junk (especially proprietary AOL content) that it’s still too confusing for a lot of people.

    IMHO, the ideal would be two simple interfaces in the app (with big buttons on the side or something to switch between them) – simple web browser email.

    I’d like to say that the time for this has come and gone, and everyone should just be able to understand the concept of “the internet”, and separate “connection” from applications, etc. but I know that’s not the case, and that’s fine.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    AOL might make it easier for some people, but in some ways it fails at this too.

    Having everything together (web, e-mail, etc. in one app) with simple, obvious icons, etc. is a good idea for that kind of user, but AOL (these days at least – or last time I saw it) clutters it up with too many ads and other junk (especially proprietary AOL content) that it’s still too confusing for a lot of people.

    IMHO, the ideal would be two simple interfaces in the app (with big buttons on the side or something to switch between them) – simple web browser email.

    I’d like to say that the time for this has come and gone, and everyone should just be able to understand the concept of “the internet”, and separate “connection” from applications, etc. but I know that’s not the case, and that’s fine.

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    AOL might make it easier for some people, but in some ways it fails at this too.

    Having everything together (web, e-mail, etc. in one app) with simple, obvious icons, etc. is a good idea for that kind of user, but AOL (these days at least – or last time I saw it) clutters it up with too many ads and other junk (especially proprietary AOL content) that it’s still too confusing for a lot of people.

    IMHO, the ideal would be two simple interfaces in the app (with big buttons on the side or something to switch between them) – simple web browser email.

    I’d like to say that the time for this has come and gone, and everyone should just be able to understand the concept of “the internet”, and separate “connection” from applications, etc. but I know that’s not the case, and that’s fine.

  • http://scatteredthoughts.us Dan

    <del datetime=”2005-06-22T18:49:09+00:00″> since</del> because if there weren’t the computer illiterate I wouldn’t have a job.

  • http://scatteredthoughts.us Dan

    <del datetime=”2005-06-22T18:49:09+00:00″> since</del> because if there weren’t the computer illiterate I wouldn’t have a job.

  • http://scatteredthoughts.us Dan

    <del datetime=”2005-06-22T18:49:09+00:00″> since</del> because if there weren’t the computer illiterate I wouldn’t have a job.

  • http://scatteredthoughts.us Dan

    <del datetime=”2005-06-22T18:49:09+00:00″> since</del> because if there weren’t the computer illiterate I wouldn’t have a job.

  • Dave Z

    I hate AOL.

    Our pastor uses AOL. ( and a MAC )

    AOL email was a center piece of a movie.

    AOL is hard to clean off my computer.

    Dan are you a closet AOL user?

  • Dave Z

    I hate AOL.

    Our pastor uses AOL. ( and a MAC )

    AOL email was a center piece of a movie.

    AOL is hard to clean off my computer.

    Dan are you a closet AOL user?

  • Dave Z

    I hate AOL.

    Our pastor uses AOL. ( and a MAC )

    AOL email was a center piece of a movie.

    AOL is hard to clean off my computer.

    Dan are you a closet AOL user?

  • Dave Z

    I hate AOL.

    Our pastor uses AOL. ( and a MAC )

    AOL email was a center piece of a movie.

    AOL is hard to clean off my computer.

    Dan are you a closet AOL user?

  • nstryker

    and is there anything wrong with them being ignorant?

  • http://freepressblog.org JaredB

    AOL might make it easier for some people, but in some ways it fails at this too.

    Having everything together (web, e-mail, etc. in one app) with simple, obvious icons, etc. is a good idea for that kind of user, but AOL (these days at least – or last time I saw it) clutters it up with too many ads and other junk (especially proprietary AOL content) that it’s still too confusing for a lot of people.

    IMHO, the ideal would be two simple interfaces in the app (with big buttons on the side or something to switch between them) – simple web browser & email.

    I’d like to say that the time for this has come and gone, and everyone should just be able to understand the concept of “the internet”, and separate “connection” from applications, etc. but I know that’s not the case, and that’s fine.

  • http://scatteredthoughts.us Dan

    I guess not since because if there weren’t the computer illiterate I wouldn’t have a job.

  • nstryker

    hate something that has no effect on you?

  • nstryker

    hate something that has no effect on you?

  • nstryker

    hate something that has no effect on you?

  • nstryker

    hate something that has no effect on you?

  • Dave Z

    I hate AOL.

    Our pastor uses AOL. ( and a MAC )

    AOL email was a center piece of a movie.

    AOL is hard to clean off my computer.

    Dan are you a closet AOL user?

  • nstryker

    i don’t understand why people hate things that doesn’t work for them. can you explain this, mr z? i mean, fine, it doesn’t work for you, don’t use it! but why hate something that has no effect on you?

blog comments powered by Disqus