Scattered » Blog Archive » Price Deathmatch: Apple MacBook Pro vs. Dell Inspiron E1705

Home / asides / Price Deathmatch: Apple MacBook Pro vs. Dell Inspiron E1705

mikemchargue.com: Price Deathmatch: Apple MacBook Pro vs. Dell Inspiron E1705

I can’t help but feel like the famed “Mac price premium” is a myth here. Dell currently offers cheaper Intel based computers than Apple, but feature-for-feature Apple’s pricing is fair. I’m posting PDFs of both stores so you can double-check my work.

Comments to “Price Deathmatch: Apple MacBook Pro vs. Dell Inspiron E1705”

eric says:

January 17, 2006 at 6:57 pm

apple is cheaper but you cant put a 2ghz processor and you cant get the resolution of 1920×1200 like the dell also who would want a smaller screen if it only weights 2 pounds less i mean if you cant carry 2 more pounds then something is wrong and you should probably not spend so much time in front of the computer.

Reply

eric says:

January 17, 2006 at 6:57 pm

apple is cheaper but you cant put a 2ghz processor and you cant get the resolution of 1920×1200 like the dell also who would want a smaller screen if it only weights 2 pounds less i mean if you cant carry 2 more pounds then something is wrong and you should probably not spend so much time in front of the computer.

Reply

eric says:

January 17, 2006 at 6:57 pm

apple is cheaper but you cant put a 2ghz processor and you cant get the resolution of 1920×1200 like the dell also who would want a smaller screen if it only weights 2 pounds less i mean if you cant carry 2 more pounds then something is wrong and you should probably not spend so much time in front of the computer.

Reply

eric says:

January 17, 2006 at 6:57 pm

apple is cheaper but you cant put a 2ghz processor and you cant get the resolution of 1920×1200 like the dell also who would want a smaller screen if it only weights 2 pounds less i mean if you cant carry 2 more pounds then something is wrong and you should probably not spend so much time in front of the computer.

Reply

Dan says:

January 17, 2006 at 8:00 pm

The higher resolution is because of a bigger screen 2 pounds might not be a lot but it is when the total girth of the thing is a lot more.

Reply

Dan says:

January 17, 2006 at 8:00 pm

The higher resolution is because of a bigger screen 2 pounds might not be a lot but it is when the total girth of the thing is a lot more.

Reply

Dan says:

January 17, 2006 at 8:00 pm

The higher resolution is because of a bigger screen 2 pounds might not be a lot but it is when the total girth of the thing is a lot more.

Reply

Dan says:

January 17, 2006 at 8:00 pm

The higher resolution is because of a bigger screen 2 pounds might not be a lot but it is when the total girth of the thing is a lot more.

Reply

Dan says:

January 17, 2006 at 9:00 pm

The higher resolution is because of a bigger screen 2 pounds might not be a lot but it is when the total girth of the thing is a lot more.

Reply

Leave a Reply