I’m not a Fanboy, I’m a fan of good technology. [full]

I’ve been called a fanboy too many times…an Apple fanboy. Let me get things straight for all of you anti-apple cool kids, “I’m not an Apple Fanboy!”.

images-2

Possibly the best definition of fanboy is from wikionary:

Someone (normally male) who is utterly devoted to a single subject or hobby, often to the point where it is considered an obsession

By that definition I could call anti-apple trolls “anti-apple fanboys” since it’s their obsession to point out their distrust no matter what the original subject was about.

Anyways…

I do tend to show appreciation for my Apple products, only because they have a positive impact more than any other. And since I’m a “techie”/gadget hobbyist and I make a living from the technology and the internet I’ve spent a lot of time preferring one product over another.

The desktop computer: It’s arguably the most essential piece of technology in our lives and the OS plays the largest roll of providing what we need and how we need it. From experience OS X is hands-down the best operating system out there; Linux at a distant second; Windows at an even further distant 3rd last.

images

Yes, Windows is the most popular OS but even though Microsoft did something right with Windows in the past to get them into this position it doesn’t mean their doing what’s right with Windows now. The only advantage they have, which is huge, is the ability to install the OS on any computer hardware you want ( if you purchase the correct version out of the four

billion available :) ). BTW: that’s not “freedom”, that’s a business decision.

With that bit of history out of the way, to hopefully distill and prevent the anti-apple fanboys ms lovers…I’ll continue…

Unlike any other OS: OS X allows me to work 10 hours in front of a computer without frustration, we all know if you useWindows you’re more than likely to get frustrated with it–daily; that’s my overwhelming experience ( I dread the 3-5 hours a week I need to use it ); I used Windows for a long time, too long, every job in my adult life included working at a Windows machine ( except one short stint at a GL where I was able go 80% OSX and 20% Linux as a sys. admin. ).

Another building block of the desktop computer is applications, regardless of what you believe Apple’s developer community is rich. It may not be as large but the quality of these applications are great, largely attributed by the developer tools that Apple provides. Anyone that says functionality defines an app is wrong, it’s the user experience. The iPhone is a great example.

Computer Wrap:

  • OS X is not perfect but in relation to any other OS it is the closest we’ve got.images-3
  • It’s also constantly improving and innovating.
  • Developer community is exceptional
  • Negative: while perfection does cost only $29 to upgrade you are required to purchase a quality piece of Apple hardware. Premium cost should be expected from a hardware and digital distribution company.

The phone may be the acclaimed as the number one technology tool it’s a close second for me:

Again, “why would I use an iPhone over a X?”, like OS X the iPhone user experience and functionality doesn’t frustrate me.

There’s only one other phone out there that didn’t frustrate me, it’s the Blackberry. Partly do to the BB stability.

I choose to use the iPhone over any blackberry or any other mobile phone because of it’s superior UE and quality

images-1

applications. There should be no doubt the Apple store was/is the best thing to happen to the phone application market, it accomplished something handango couldn’t and it’s something all major handheld venders ( MS, BB, Palm and Android ) are moving to. Even other verticals, like the DSi and PSP have adopted something very similar.

In comparison the difference between these new app stores are/could-be restrictions but no-one really knows. The

current stores ( android ) are rather small but still have their problems of removals and rejected apps.

Phone Wrap:

  • The app store has been successful for all parties involved: Apple, the developer and the biggest successor is the consumer. You could also include any future or present alternatives.
  • The iPhone hardware is solid, it’s changed minimally over the last few years and it’s only now that some vendors are catching up ( e.g. G2 ) but…
  • …like the desktop OS the phone’s OS is critical to UE and the iPhone OS is exceptional compared to the competition. Partly attributed by the application restrictions that also cause a negative downside…
  • Negative: Apple is making some really bad decisions for their customers and whether ATT is pulling them or requiring apple to do so shouldn’t matter.
  • No-one knows what the real motivation or calculated business decisions was/were/are made behind rejecting apps or removing applications.

One would take the opportunity to theorize a master planned conspiracy for world domination with that last point; instead I’ll refrain from concluding anything ( except [1] ); but and if those unlikely theories do come to pass my continues review of alternatives will lead me to the best user experience and productivity in my digital life/work–regardless of the company.

[1] …except to point out that all media rights owners ( music and video ) and iphone application vendors have a choice to deal with Apple distribution channel and their restrictions.

About the Author, Dan Cameron:

I'm the owner and solution engineer at Sprout Venture, a web solutions company that specializes in web development including WordPress.

I started my first blog in 2003 and transitioned to WordPress in 2004. Since moving to WordPress I've written a few plugins and themes for public consumption. Lately I'm busy engineering/building/coding and have only been able to share a few code snippets.

If you're in need of some web development, web design or custom WordPress plugins and/or themes contact me, I'll be happy to discuss it with you.

Read More »

  • I disagree with a lot of what you've said in this post. I'm not a fanboy either (actually an operating system agnostic, really), but I can honestly tell you that I love Microsoft Windows and wouldn't switch unless I was forced to.

    Please note this isn't from a lack of experience, either. During college I dual booted Windows Vista and Ubuntu Linux for about a year and a half and regularly used a super powerful Mac desktop PC in our computer lab. I never, ever, felt productive using the Mac. None of my keyboard shortcuts worked and the fact that applications never really closed without explicitly opening the system menu and "Quit"ing them was just weird. I hardly eve use my mouse when I'm sitting at my computer (I navigate the system almost entirely by keyboard) and that just wasn't possible in my many hours of experience with Apple OS X.

    You say that OS X far outpaces Linux and Microsoft Windows as an operating system, but I don't see how. Perhaps you really like the pretty UI, and that's fine. The fact that Windows doesn't have a lot of pretty brushed chrome doesn't bother me. Maybe you like the font rendering in OS X, but I can't stand it. You don't really give any reasons why OS X is 1, Linux is a distant 2, and MS is in last.

    You say that Apple's developer community is rich. I'm not going to disagree as I know there are a variety of really well done apps on OS X, but you and I both know that the Windows development ecosystem is probably 2-3 orders of magnitude greater than that of OS X. The thing is, we don't see the majority of Windows applications because they are for vertical markets that we're not in. There are a ton of Mac designer tools (and I'm sure you use some of them) and a modicum of good developer tools (again, sure you use some of these, too) but that's where all of the good OS X apps are, and you see all these because that's the business you're in.

    Further, your history lesson leaves out important parts of the OS story as a whole. When Apple released OS X, they basically said "screw you" to all the applications that ran on previous versions of their operating system. There is no way in hell that Microsoft could ever just forgo backwards compatibility and say "Well, use our new API." None. Apple could because they had basically no market penetration (and almost none is small vertical and corporate markets). This is the same reason that IE has been so slow to evolve over time. Microsoft CANNOT not support applications and web pages written with the old version of its browser.

    Furthermore, you claim that the ability to install a Microsoft OS on any hardware that you choose is not freedom, merely a business decision. I respectfully disagree. Recently I built a monster of a machine and installed a fresh copy of Windows Vista that I had a license for. Buying a machine with similar specs from a big box or custom PC manufacturer would have cost me close to $4000. A Mac with similar specifications would have cost me $6000. The freedom to build my own PC and install my OS of choice on it saved me $2000. I'd say that's freedom. I also have the freedom to pull out and plug in any new components that I choose at any point. That IS freedom that Apple doesn't allow.

    While most of this comment has been directed towards Apple computers, I'd like to turn my attention to the iPhone for a moment. I do own an iPhone, and I like it. It is relatively easy to use if I want to make a call or browse the internet. However, when my contract is up I won't be keeping my iPhone or upgrading to the current version. I refuse to support a company that decides what software it's users can install on their phone. I really wouldn't care if stuff didn't show up in the app store, but I can't get apps anywhere else and that is bogus. How do you think people would respond if every Microsoft application had to be approved for distribution onto Windows PCs? I can guarantee right now that the iPod (and subsequently the iPhone would not be very popular) would not have market dominance (because no one would have bought one if iTunes wasn't allowed on their PCs... you know because it duplicates functionality provided with the OS in Windows Media Player.)

    In sum, I think that Apple machines are overpriced, the OS has nothing that I don't have on my Windows PC (except maybe the terminal, but that's why I have Linux and SSH), and Apple's business practices tend more towards shady than Microsoft's ever had. Also, Apple proponents get a bad name because half of them use M$ to refer to Microsoft, and that really enrages me and everyone else who is halfway intelligent.
  • Finally, time to reply...I'll try to cover as much as I can.

    "I can honestly tell you that I love Microsoft Windows and wouldn't switch unless I was forced to"
    Through my extended experience with OSX, Windows and Ubuntu these are my sentiments exactly but with OSX.

    I don't really want to question your experience with OSX but I must :)...
    It sounds like you didn't spend that much time with the OS: the key commands in OSX are very similar to Windows, the only difference is using the command ( apple ) key instead of control, it does take some time and more importantly effort to learn them but once you do the tradeoffs are great. The OS has far better ( and more commands ) than Win and it seems to me that developers use key commands *a lot* more in OS X ( maybe easier to develop for ;) ); Quitting -- is oh so easy in OSX, it's simply command+Q. That command is also consistent throughout the system, no matter the application -- something I found Win didn't have, where one application would quit with one command and Word couldn't quit at all; consistency is huge and I believe OSX has that, I can't say it's because of the developers or the dev tools, but it's clear and shows in day-to-day use.

    Font rendering is way better but I'm not keen to the "pretty" aspect of OSX, the first thing I do is turn off some of it's effects ( like the genie effect for the dock ). However, I do love the cool features that are built into the system. Something that may be classified as a pretty feature, like timemachine, spotlight, and/or expose, are awesome features that change how productive I am -- it's only a bonus for how well they're executed.

    I thought I gave some reasons as to why OSX outpaces the rest ( stability, security, performance, usability, application richness. did I mention stability and performance? oh yeah I did ).

    Applications: Yes, I agree Win has a ton more apps--way more. But I tried to express quality over quantity.

    Legacy: I would disagree completely, MS supporting legacy is horrible for their own OS advancement. They also don't need to drop anything with one release, they could easily phase support out. Just like OSX has shown ( your comment about them dropping support is wrong BTW ), when OSX came out they supported OS9 applications through at least two releases, when the intel architecture change happened OSX supported all PPC apps and provided some very easy tools for devs to make their apps universal binary, only until this latest release of snow leopard did they drop PPC applications.

    OSX is pushing for advancement by not supporting legacy, Win is not. WhyTF does Win still have a registry? WTF do they still use NTFS? WTF...for days.

    Think of it this way, until Win7 comes out MS's best OS is Windows XP and that's because it's the most stable nothing more.

    Yes, I hear a lot of good things about W7, most of which where supposed to be included in the bomb that was Vista but I honestly want W7 to succeed. It would be nice to have the most dominant OS catch up to what OSX has had for years.

    Hardware + Freedom: I too have the freedom to do whatever I want with my MacPro. I could install Windows, change RAM ( have done ), configure a RAID setup with new drives ( have done ), change the graphics card, install new disc drives. This is a common misconception with Macs now-a-days. Since Apple moved to the Intel arch. you can swap just about anything you want and install any OS you want. The only issue is the premium you're paying for the hardware, which isn't much in my experience. In your experience it was about a 50% difference but I'm guessing it's more like 10-15% if you upgraded the MacPro outside of the Apple store.

    I've already talked about the premium aspect of Apple hardware before but the premium tax is worth it for me, even if I didn't want to use OSX. The Macbooks are prime examples of this and if you were to price compare a Macbook with a similar "premium" laptop with similar industrial design ( size and quality ) you'd be surprised.

    iPhone: you're comparison is distorted. Try comparing the app store ( where that's the only place you can get apps ) with another phone like the Android, WinMo marketplace or the Pre store -- not PCs. I do agree that there should be some drastic changes to the app store but the Android market and all other stores have an approval process too, the difference is you can install apps outside of the respective store. Don't get me wrong that's a huge difference but these competitors need openness because they're playing catchup not because it's a mantra of their business ( excluding Android from that statement ).

    Closing: If you're statement of "the OS has nothing that I don't have on my Windows PC" is true I can't argue with that. I know for me it's not true, especially in regards to quality and stability.

    Business Practices: Apple is definitely becoming a monster. However, I don't think their business practices are comparable to MS's past anti-trust, monopolistic practices, anti-competitive issues ( SCO involvement! ) and patent issues ( XML in Office ). So in short Apple is anti-competitive because of it's lock down but it's also pushing for advancement -- think of how the phone markets would be without the iPhone ( the BB would still be the best PDA phone), how the web would be without Webkit ( or the mobile web ), music market without iTunes ( the music Industry would still be having it's way with DRM ), music devices without the iPod ( doubt the Zune HD would be as good as it is ) or computer hardware without having a premium competitor ( especially laptops, look at Dell's new line ).

    Anyways, hope that clears up your rant to my rant with another one of my rants.
  • OK, so I should have read this before commenting again on that GR story, since it is good to see you (albeit very lightly) acknowledge some degree of wrongdoing on Apple's part in this post. I'll just copy the part of my last comment from over there that I think still applies...

    Like I've said before, the thing that really gets me going on this (not seriously, but it is annoying) is all the crap that Apple "fanboys" (or other devoted fans, whatever they may call themselves) like to dish out towards MS, but are totally oblivious to how much of the same criticism applies to Apple.

    Some of them also loudly and proudly denounce the RIAA and MPAA, while patronizing the hugest peddler of DRM in the market (pondering to those parties in doing so). Some of the ones who consider themselves real "techies" even claim to promote the philosophies of software freedom, while at the same time eagerly embracing the most non-free platform they could possibly choose.

    These are the underlying issues I have with Apple and the people who love them, because I do honestly believe that people who know enough about the technology to recognize what is wrong and are capable of choosing and promoting alternatives (which may initially be more difficult) should do so. When that does not happen because people are just too comfortable to rock the boat and demand better, it is disappointing.

    As a side note, I never bag on Apple to the many people I know who use it that aren't fully capable of understanding the issues and choosing alternative solutions, so those of you who I do gripe to can take my rants as a compliment - that I believe you are capable of driving towards better solutions in the long run, at the possible expense of some degree of comfort today.

    Is it wrong to accept, favor, or endorse the tech which you feel is currently the best? On the surface, you could easily say "no, of course not". But I say it depends. Sometimes "the good can be the enemy of the best", and in accepting easier solutions that are non-optimal rather than pushing for the best even though that may be more challenging, I think we let ourselves and society down in the long run.

    To reach into a familiar market to tech enthusiasts for an example, it didn't used to be that way. When DVDs were first arriving on the scene, DIVX (not DivX) was pushed by the big corps and was heavily encumbered with all sorts of DRM-ish restrictions. Savvy consumers rallied enough to make it quickly obsolete. It's sad that the same thing doesn't happen today. Most "techies" let things like HDCP slide right by, because their new high def pictures are so pretty, and they just plain can't be bothered to make the effort to vote with their wallets.
blog comments powered by Disqus