Scattered » Blog Archive » CSS Switcher

Home / asides / CSS Switcher

Is anyone using my ajax style switcher on this site? Is it just not noticeable enough?

css

Comments to “CSS Switcher”

« Older Comments

JaredB says:

May 31, 2007 at 11:09 pm

Or are you saying you didn’t get what I was saying? Just in case, I was just making a joke that having accessibility issues is basically like electronically slapping people with handicaps in the face when they try to use your site, and javascript-only links are non-accessible.

Reply

JaredB says:

May 31, 2007 at 11:09 pm

Or are you saying you didn’t get what I was saying? Just in case, I was just making a joke that having accessibility issues is basically like electronically slapping people with handicaps in the face when they try to use your site, and javascript-only links are non-accessible.

Reply

JaredB says:

May 31, 2007 at 11:09 pm

Or are you saying you didn’t get what I was saying? Just in case, I was just making a joke that having accessibility issues is basically like electronically slapping people with handicaps in the face when they try to use your site, and javascript-only links are non-accessible.

Reply

JaredB says:

May 31, 2007 at 11:09 pm

Or are you saying you didn’t get what I was saying? Just in case, I was just making a joke that having accessibility issues is basically like electronically slapping people with handicaps in the face when they try to use your site, and javascript-only links are non-accessible.

Reply

nstryker says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:08 am

a “this” linker like jared shouldn’t throw stones on accessibility issues. of course dan’s also a this linker.

Reply

nstryker says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:08 am

a “this” linker like jared shouldn’t throw stones on accessibility issues. of course dan’s also a this linker.

Reply

nstryker says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:08 am

a “this” linker like jared shouldn’t throw stones on accessibility issues. of course dan’s also a this linker.

Reply

nstryker says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:08 am

a “this” linker like jared shouldn’t throw stones on accessibility issues. of course dan’s also a this linker.

Reply

nstryker says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:08 am

a “this” linker like jared shouldn’t throw stones on accessibility issues. of course dan’s also a this linker.

Reply

nstryker says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:08 am

a “this” linker like jared shouldn’t throw stones on accessibility issues. of course dan’s also a this linker.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Well, it was just a joke after all, but I would strongly that “this” linking is as bad an accessibility issue as javascript only links.

“This” links may not be as descriptive as they could be (although that can be addressed with alt text), but they’re still clearly understood (and functional) in the context of the content, whereas javascript-only links just don’t work.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Well, it was just a joke after all, but I would strongly that “this” linking is as bad an accessibility issue as javascript only links.

“This” links may not be as descriptive as they could be (although that can be addressed with alt text), but they’re still clearly understood (and functional) in the context of the content, whereas javascript-only links just don’t work.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Well, it was just a joke after all, but I would strongly that “this” linking is as bad an accessibility issue as javascript only links.

“This” links may not be as descriptive as they could be (although that can be addressed with alt text), but they’re still clearly understood (and functional) in the context of the content, whereas javascript-only links just don’t work.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Well, it was just a joke after all, but I would strongly that “this” linking is as bad an accessibility issue as javascript only links.

“This” links may not be as descriptive as they could be (although that can be addressed with alt text), but they’re still clearly understood (and functional) in the context of the content, whereas javascript-only links just don’t work.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Well, it was just a joke after all, but I would strongly that “this” linking is as bad an accessibility issue as javascript only links.

“This” links may not be as descriptive as they could be (although that can be addressed with alt text), but they’re still clearly understood (and functional) in the context of the content, whereas javascript-only links just don’t work.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Well, it was just a joke after all, but I would strongly that “this” linking is as bad an accessibility issue as javascript only links.

“This” links may not be as descriptive as they could be (although that can be addressed with alt text), but they’re still clearly understood (and functional) in the context of the content, whereas javascript-only links just don’t work.

Reply

Dan says:

June 1, 2007 at 6:54 pm

My joke was going off yours, stating you’re a handicapped person without javascript but it didn’t work since I wouldn’t be really offending people or an orginization if I did.

Reply

Dan says:

June 1, 2007 at 6:54 pm

My joke was going off yours, stating you’re a handicapped person without javascript but it didn’t work since I wouldn’t be really offending people or an orginization if I did.

Reply

Dan says:

June 1, 2007 at 6:54 pm

My joke was going off yours, stating you’re a handicapped person without javascript but it didn’t work since I wouldn’t be really offending people or an orginization if I did.

Reply

Dan says:

June 1, 2007 at 6:54 pm

My joke was going off yours, stating you’re a handicapped person without javascript but it didn’t work since I wouldn’t be really offending people or an orginization if I did.

Reply

Dan says:

June 1, 2007 at 6:54 pm

My joke was going off yours, stating you’re a handicapped person without javascript but it didn’t work since I wouldn’t be really offending people or an orginization if I did.

Reply

Dan says:

June 1, 2007 at 6:54 pm

My joke was going off yours, stating you’re a handicapped person without javascript but it didn’t work since I wouldn’t be really offending people or an orginization if I did.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:19 pm

Ah, got it.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:19 pm

Ah, got it.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:19 pm

Ah, got it.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:19 pm

Ah, got it.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:19 pm

Ah, got it.

Reply

JaredB says:

June 1, 2007 at 9:19 pm

Ah, got it.

Reply

« Older Comments

Leave a Reply