logoAbout Me: I'm a freelance web developer that specializes in WordPress Themes and plugin development. I've written about some of my projects here.
Hire me e-mail

Home / asides / ‘Flailing’, Eh?

I completely agree with John, Mike’s rant about his computer problems is meaningless and should be posted on his personal blog not TechCrunch.

It seems to me if he were to spread out his computer purchases outside of Apple he would see that gadgets and technology fail a lot – no matter if you’re dell, acer, HP or Apple.

The key to a great computer/consumer-electronics company is their service and as you can see people are ultimately satisfied with Apple, regardless if there were technical issues.

(via ‘Flailing’, Eh?)

Mike Arrington, extrapolating from his own personal experience with some apparent lemon MacBooks:

They need to get their house in order or they risk alienating all these new customers they’ve added over the last few years. The new buyers aren’t Apple fanatics and won’t sit quietly as they try to access broken services via failing hardware.

Let’s see what the just-released 2008 American Customer Satisfaction Index says:

Apple Inc. trounced rival computer makers selling Windows-equipped PCs by historic margins in an annual customer satisfaction survey, the poll’s chief researcher said today.

“We haven’t seen anything like this before, where a company scores 10 points over its nearest rival,” said Claes Fornell, the head of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), conducted quarterly by the University of Michigan.

Apple’s customer satisfaction score of 85, an ACSI record in the personal computer category, was 10 points higher than the closest competitor, Dell Inc.; 12 points higher than Hewlett-Packard Co.; and 13 higher than Gateway, which was acquired by Acer last year.

Is Apple perfect? No. Does it suck when you buy a new Mac that doesn’t work right? Yes. But is Apple doing a far better job than any of its competitors? Yes.

  • I'm not sure who this John guy is, but he's way off base if he's trying to say that Mike should have posted this on his personal blog rather than TechCrunch.

    For one thing, TechCrunch is (one of) Mike's blog, and he can post whatever he wants there. It's completely up to his discretion what he posts and where.

    As for the matter of his personal experiences, and how they shape his opinions being irrelevant, I seem to remember someone arguing strongly that those kind of things were valid and very relevant when it comes to judging product lines and/or companies. I think I saw it on some blog somewhere... :-)

    But seriously, you could almost consider any anit-Apple post Mike might make to be link-bait, since it is an absolute guarantee that the legions of mac-boys will respond in droves to anything that even hints negatively about any aspect of Apple, especially on a high profile site.
  • Oh, now I see the original item in your Google Shared feed, so I know who "John" is that you're referring to.

    I thought you had added a link to the shared GR item here in your blog; am I missing it? I can't see it.
  • Oh, I found it - that little teeny, tiny star icon with no text at the bottom of the article, right? Not sure why I didn't notice that earlier. :-)
blog comments powered by Disqus